Re: persistent ramfs issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-07-19, at 11:09, Ryan O'Neill wrote:
> I have developed a file system, it is a virtual memory file system
> with persistence -- the persistence essentially works by storing the
> fs data (from memory) into the slack space
> of ext3 files (We are working on CentOS 5.3 -- old I know). The
> following details should be sufficient.

Sounds like a hacker toolkit.

> Is this some type of page cache issue? How can I get around this? Any
> input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
> 
> I can't really give code slices, but the general idea is
> 
> i_size = i_size_read(inode);
> i_size += extended_size;
> i_size_write(inode, isize);
> mark_inode_dirty(ext3_inode);
> wakeup_pdflush(0); <- I realize this is an overkill, but I was just
> trying to get it to work before I used aops->commit_write on the
> actual page of the inode.

Anything you do like this is just begging to corrupt the user's data, since the "temporary" size change may race with real size changes and/or expose your data to normal applications.  It's just a bad idea, IMHO.

Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux