Re: [PATCH, RFC] simplify writeback thread creation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chiming onto this thread late, I've definitely seen customer workloads
which used a whole fleet-load of blades connected to a SAN network,
the idea being that the blades were easily replaceable, and could take
various different responsibilities due to shifting workload, battle damage,
etc.   So this would be a case where the individual blades wouldn't have
huge amounts of memory, but there would be a huge number of block
devices available on the SAN network.   So at least in this case, avoiding
creating every single BDI thread until the block devices is first used
would be a major win for this sort of customer deployment.

-- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux