On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 10:31:22AM -0400, David P. Quigley wrote: > > > +#define NFS4_MAXLABELLEN 4096 > > Idle curiosity--why 4096? (Why couldn't it be 16? And how do we know > people will never want 8192?) I think I raised this a while back, too. The maximum security label size on Linux is: #define XATTR_SIZE_MAX 65536 Why arbitrarily limit this over the network? Someone could have a valid local security label which can't be conveyed via NFS. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html