> What I do have interest in is fixing get_task_comm's use of buffers, which > is theoretically problematic in some future where someone accidentally > calls it with a buffer smaller than sizeof(task->comm). Lots of things are theoretically problematic and kernel would take a week to boot if we covered them all 8) Having a struct task_name { char [propersize]; } would produce the same code as far as I can tell and so typechecking though - so as you say it can be done sanely. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html