Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Implement balance_dirty_pages() through waiting for flusher thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:14 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> +/*
> + * Compare counter against given value.
> + * Return 1 if greater, 0 if equal and -1 if less
> + */
> +int percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs)
> +{
> +       s64     count;
> +
> +       count = percpu_counter_read(fbc);
> +       /* Check to see if rough count will be sufficient for comparison */
> +       if (abs(count - rhs) > (percpu_counter_batch*num_online_cpus())) {
> +               if (count > rhs)
> +                       return 1;
> +               else
> +                       return -1;
> +       }
> +       /* Need to use precise count */
> +       count = percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
> +       if (count > rhs)
> +               return 1;
> +       else if (count < rhs)
> +               return -1;
> +       else
> +               return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_compare); 

That won't quite work as advertised for the bdi stuff since we use a
custom batch size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux