On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 16:10 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I just got an idea - if the sleeping is too unfair (as threads at the end > of the FIFO are likely to have 'pause' smaller and thus could find out > earlier that the system is below dirty limits), we could share 'pause' > among all threads waiting for that BDI. That way threads would wake up > in a FIFO order... Sounds sensible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
