Re: [PATCH v2] d_ino considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Dillow:
> For example, our main Lustre scratch space has over 285 million files in
> it, and using find -inum takes over 72 hours to walk the tree using
	:::
> Using ne2scan -- which uses libext2fs and combines the inode scan and
> the name lookup -- takes over 48 hours to generate a list of candidate
> files for the purge example. With an optimized inode scan and the custom
	:::

While I've never heard of ne2scan, I am interested in this simplified
problem such as "find the pathname(s) from an inum in a huge fs."
Is ne2scan essentially equivalent to "debugfs ncheck inum"?

About Valeris's patch, as long as "ls -i" is useful/helpful,
> +	/* Use of d_ino without st_dev is always buggy. */
is not true.


J. R. Okajima

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux