Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim and use a_ops->writepages() where possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:49:49PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 12:26 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:45:16PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >[21877.951204]  [<ffffffffa009bde4>] xfs_vm_writepage+0x84/0x160 [xfs]
> >[21877.951301]  [<ffffffff800e3603>] pageout+0x143/0x2b0
> >[21877.951308]  [<ffffffff800e514e>] shrink_page_list+0x26e/0x650
> >[21877.951314]  [<ffffffff800e5803>] shrink_inactive_list+0x2d3/0x7c0
> >[21877.951320]  [<ffffffff800e5d4b>] shrink_list+0x5b/0x110
> >[21877.951325]  [<ffffffff800e5f71>] shrink_zone+0x171/0x250
> >[21877.951330]  [<ffffffff800e60d3>] shrink_zones+0x83/0x120
> >[21877.951336]  [<ffffffff800e620e>] do_try_to_free_pages+0x9e/0x380
> >[21877.951342]  [<ffffffff800e6607>] try_to_free_pages+0x77/0xa0
> >[21877.951349]  [<ffffffff800dbfa3>] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x2d3/0x5c0
> >[21877.951355]  [<ffffffff800dc3e1>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x151/0x160
> >[21877.951362]  [<ffffffff800d44b7>] __page_cache_alloc+0x27/0x50
> >[21877.951368]  [<ffffffff800d68ca>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x9a/0xe0
> >[21877.951376]  [<ffffffff8014bdfe>] block_write_begin+0xae/0x120
> >[21877.951396]  [<ffffffffa009ac24>] xfs_vm_write_begin+0x34/0x50 [xfs]
> 
> This is already in a filesystem.  Why does ->writepage get
> called a second time?  Shouldn't this have a gfp_mask
> without __GFP_FS set?

No, we're allowed to use __GFP_FS with i_mutex held.

> 
> >[21877.951482]  [<ffffffff800d4b31>] generic_perform_write+0xc1/0x1f0
> >[21877.951489]  [<ffffffff800d5d00>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x90/0x160
> >[21877.951512]  [<ffffffffa00a4711>] xfs_write+0x521/0xb60 [xfs]
> >[21877.951624]  [<ffffffffa009fb80>] xfs_file_aio_write+0x70/0xa0 [xfs]
> >[21877.951711]  [<ffffffff80118c42>] do_sync_write+0x102/0x160
> >[21877.951718]  [<ffffffff80118fc8>] vfs_write+0xd8/0x1c0
> >[21877.951723]  [<ffffffff8011995b>] sys_write+0x5b/0xa0
> >[21877.951729]  [<ffffffff8000c868>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >[21877.951736]  [<00007fc41b0fab10>] 0x7fc41b0fab10
> >[21877.951750] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000108743280
> >[21877.951755] IP: [<ffffffff80034832>] dequeue_task+0x72/0x110
> >[21877.951766] PGD 31c6f067 PUD 0
> >[21877.951770] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux