On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:47:01AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > /*
> > + * TODO: Try merging with migrations version of putback_lru_pages
> > + */
> > +static noinline_for_stack void putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone,
> > + struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat,
> > + unsigned long nr_anon, unsigned long nr_file,
> > + struct list_head *page_list)
> > +{
>
> I hate to nitpick on this, but with noinline_for_stack a prototype
> really is unreadbale unless the function identifier goes to the next
> line. Compare the one above with:
>
> static noinline_for_stack void
> putback_lru_pages(struct zone *zone, struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat,
> unsigned long nr_anon, unsigned long nr_file,
> struct list_head *page_list)
>
> > -static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> > +static noinline_for_stack unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> > struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> > int priority, int file)
>
> Same here, just even worse due to the spill over ove 80 characters.
>
It's a fair nitpick and so is cleaned up.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
