On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:34:18AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > If direct reclaim can overflow the stack, so can direct > memcg reclaim. That means this patch does not solve the > stack overflow, while admitting that we do need the > ability to get specific pages flushed to disk from the > pageout code. Can you explain what the hell memcg reclaim is and why it needs to reclaim from random contexts? It seems everything that has a cg in it's name that I stumbled over lately seems to be some ugly wart.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
