On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 12:31 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:05:20PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > AFFS does not ever wait for superblock synchronization in
> > ->put_super(), ->write_super, and ->sync_fs().
> >
> > However, it should wait for synchronization in ->put_super() because
> > it is about to be unmounted, in ->write_super() because this is
> > periodic SB synchronization performed from a separate kernel thread,
> > and in ->sync_fs() it should respect the 'wait' flag. This patch fixes
> > the situation.
> >
> > Also, in ->put_super(), do not write the SB if it is not dirty.
>
> ->sync_fs should also wait for the superblock I/O to be completed.
Err, depending on the 'wait' flag? I did:
@@ -74,7 +76,7 @@ static int
affs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
lock_super(sb);
- affs_commit_super(sb, 2);
+ affs_commit_super(sb, wait, 2);
sb->s_dirt = 0;
unlock_super(sb);
return 0;
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
