Re: [PATCH 6/6] vmscan: Do not writeback pages in direct reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:43:31AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Of course, but making a change like that in the current VM will cause a
> large number of dirty pages to get refiled, so the impact of this
> change on some workloads could be quite bad.

Note that ext4, btrfs and xfs all error out on ->writepage from reclaim
context.  That is both kswapd and direct reclaim because there is no way
to distinguish between the two.  Things seem to work fine with these
filesystems, so the issue can't be _that_ bad.  Of course reducing this
to just error out from direct reclaim, and fixing them VM to better
cope with it is even better.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux