On 06/09/2010 01:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:05:36PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 01:22 AM, Al Viro wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Al hi. >> >> This patch is nice off course, but it clashes with a patch >> I was intending to push to linux-next today. (For 2.6.36 kernel) >> >> The patch is the one to convert to the new truncate sequence: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127539189718732&w=2 >> >> In fact I was meaning to ask you if you could take this patch >> through your tree, so Christoph could base his cleanup on this >> as well. > > The new truncate sequence bits already are in Al's tree. And as > I said a few times before life would really be a lot simpler if > you just base things ontop of that. It makes the API for the > file system a lot better. > Will do. Patch based on vfs/for-next posted as reply. (Please review?) Al's patch thing still holds, Al? Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
