Re: OOM problem caused by fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Seth,

On 06/08/2010 01:34 AM, Seth Huang wrote:
Are you using set_page_dirty to dirty the pages?

Since part of our fs resembles nfs, we use
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers() for
address_space_operations->set_page_dirty, the same way nfs works.

Are you sure you don't have a refcount leak?

One of my partners have already checked the page flags and reference
count. They seem to be all right.
Maybe we should check them again.
Which kernel version do you use?
Have you tried to change vm.lowmem_reserve_ratio? Check
Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt for how to use it.

Regards,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux