Re: [topic proposal] dealing with ->d_revalidate() right ways (automounting, atomic opens and the whole mess around that)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:19:40AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 	That's going to be the next big change of VFS architecture; bits
> and pieces had been discussed on lists and in private mail, but it would
> be really useful to sit down and discuss that face to face with everyone
> involved.

	I'd want to be in on this from the ocfs2 perspective.  I think
that d_revalidate() works for us as-is, but I'd want to be in on
proposed changes.

Joel

-- 

"We'd better get back, `cause it'll be dark soon,
 and they mostly come at night.  Mostly."

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux