On 08/06/10 18.14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > When we call writeback_inodes_wb from writeback_inodes_sb we always have > s_umount held, which currently makes the whole operation a no-op. > > But if we are called to write out inodes for a specific superblock we always > have s_umount held, so replace the incorrect logic checking for WB_SYNC_ALL > which only worked by coincidence with the proper check for an explicit > superblock argument. This is tons better than the pinning, I like it a lot. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
