Re: [git pull] vfs pile, part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 08:47:53PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> My apologies, I thought you'd been Cc'd on the discussions with Ian concerning
> that stuff, but...
> 
> The bottom line: "autofs4: always use lookup for lookup" is needed for them
> and it had to be reverted since it'd been FUBAR.
> 
> Details: we really, *really* can not do things in ->d_revalidate() and count
> on ->lookup() to come and finish them.  Think for a minute and you'll see why -
> between these two calls we allocate a dentry to pass to ->lookup().  What
> happens if that allocation fails?
> 
> And without that patch your stuff breaks autofs4.  So it's waiting for the
> ->d_revalidate() interface redesign.  Hopefully in the coming cycle...

In addition to that autofs also needs either major surgery or to be
dropped.  If we want to do the latter we'd be better of to strongly
deprecate it now.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux