On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:23:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > A more conventional and superior naming scheme is > subsystemid_specific_function_identifier(). eg, bio_add_page() instead > of add_page_to_bio(). > > So these want to be sb_mark_dirty(), etc. > > Being very old code written by very yound people, the VFS kinda ignores > that convention, but it doesn't hurt to use it for new code. > > Feel free to ignore me if that's too much of a PITA ;) The real issue is that it's almost certainly an overdesign. Let's get rid of the bogus uses first and figure out what's happening in what remains, OK? I have no problems with doing such wrappers, but if we touch every place using ->s_dirt anyway, let's at least take a good look at them. I'm mostly OK with what had emerged for the final patch in series, but... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
