Re: [linux-cifs-client] [PATCH] cifs: implement drop_inode superblock op

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Any rough idea of performance or memory savings (even in something
artificial like dbench run)?

It's more of a memory savings thing. When I mount with -o noserverino
and run fsstress on the mount, I'd regularly see the size of the
cifs_inode_cache hit 60M or more (on a client with 1G RAM). With this
patch in place, it rarely goes over 2M in size.

Eventually, memory pressure will force the size to go down, but if we
know that they'll never be used again (which is the case with
noserverino), it's better to go ahead and just free them.

I take it this overrides the behavior of the vfs_cache_pressure before the memory pressure makes reclaiming cache necessary?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux