On Wed, May 26 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:45:57PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > BTW, if you have one more chance to test... Use the latest one, but also > > apply this one: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/26/215 > > > > which fixes a silly thinko that's closely related to this logic. > > I already had this applied during my test run for your second patch. OK. From your previous mail: For now I would recommend to revert 21c12849fef73efc9a898b6702fe421fd774f515 and 29c795f02e68ecd7bb1374844d3e55e882ac158f, which makes xfstests run fine for me. Just to ensure we are on the same page, what commits are these? They are not valid shas in Linus' tree. Did you mean e913fc825dc685a444cb4c1d0f9d32f372f59861 7c8a3554c683f512dbcee26faedb42e4c05f12fa ? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
