Re: [PATCHv4 05/17] EXOFS: do not manipulate s_dirt directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/25/2010 04:49 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ... use new VFS helpers instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Ack-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/exofs/file.c  |    2 +-
>  fs/exofs/inode.c |    2 +-
>  fs/exofs/super.c |    6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/file.c b/fs/exofs/file.c
> index 839b9dc..be38834 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/file.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int exofs_file_fsync(struct file *filp, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	/* This is a good place to write the sb */
>  	/* TODO: Sechedule an sb-sync on create */
>  	sb = inode->i_sb;
> -	if (sb->s_dirt)
> +	if (is_sb_dirty(sb))
>  		exofs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>  
>  	return ret;
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/inode.c b/fs/exofs/inode.c
> index d7c6afa..0195dcc 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/inode.c
> @@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ struct inode *exofs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, int mode)
>  
>  	sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
>  
> -	sb->s_dirt = 1;
> +	mark_sb_dirty(sb);
>  	inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode);
>  	inode->i_ino = sbi->s_nextid++;
>  	inode->i_blkbits = EXOFS_BLKSHIFT;
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/super.c b/fs/exofs/super.c
> index 03149b9..91a32ea 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/super.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ int exofs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
>  		EXOFS_ERR("%s: exofs_sbi_write failed.\n", __func__);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -	sb->s_dirt = 0;
> +	mark_sb_clean(sb);
>  
>  out:
>  	EXOFS_DBGMSG("s_nextid=0x%llx ret=%d\n", _LLU(sbi->s_nextid), ret);
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void exofs_write_super(struct super_block *sb)
>  	if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
>  		exofs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>  	else
> -		sb->s_dirt = 0;
> +		mark_sb_clean(sb);
>  }
>  
>  static void _exofs_print_device(const char *msg, const char *dev_path,
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void exofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
>  	int num_pend;
>  	struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
>  
> -	if (sb->s_dirt)
> +	if (is_sb_dirty(sb))
>  		exofs_write_super(sb);
>  
>  	/* make sure there are no pending commands */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux