On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:39:25AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> The schemes I'm talking about typically had special memory pools
> preallocated for use by daemons, and would label the daemons using some
> equivalent of the PF_MEMALLOC flag to prevent recursion into the
> filesystem.
Yes. In my opinion, proper solution has to be careful at three points:
- daemons must be carefully written not to require much memory
- daemons should 'inherit' PF_MEMALLOC while processing upcalls
- FS should try to flush fast enough (what W. Adamson wrote) and
delay new allocations when it cannot
Regards,
Zdenek Salvet salvet@xxxxxxxxxxx
Institute of Computer Science of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
and CESNET, z.s.p.o., Prague, Czech Republic
Phone: ++420-549 49 6534 Fax: ++420-541 212 747
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teamwork is essential -- it allows you to blame someone else.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
