Re: [PATCH] VFS: Unlink should revoke all outstanding leases on file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:46:23PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> 
> 
> J. Bruce Fields :
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:31:12PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 13:59 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: 
> >>> Note that the server should also recall the delegation if someone
> >>> attempts to violate the guarantees that are listed in section 9.4: Open
> >>> Delegation
> >>>
> >>>    When a client has a read open delegation, it may not make any changes
> >>>    to the contents or attributes of the file but it is assured that no
> >>>    other client may do so.  When a client has a write open delegation,
> >>>    it may modify the file data since no other client will be accessing
> >>>    the file's data.  The client holding a write delegation may only
> >>>    affect file attributes which are intimately connected with the file
> >>>    data:  size, time_modify, change.
> >>>
> >>> IOW: even if you hold a write delegation you are not allowed to change
> >>> the file mode bits, owner, group or acls...
> >> ...or the nlink value. So technically, we should also recall the
> >> delegation when someone creates or deletes a hard link. I think I need
> >> to remind Tom that he should add that to the RFC3530bis draft...
> > 
> > Yep.  And fixing all these cases is required before our the server's
> > NFSv4 server is ready for much of anything.
> > 
> > I'm not sure ading break_lease() to may_delete() is right, but maybe
> > it's better than nothing.
> 
>   Agree with you.
> 
> > 
> > One problem is that there's a race: nothing I can see stops anyone from
> > getting another lease after may_delete() but before the delete happens.
> 
>   Yes. 
>   The problem will exist, but there isn't some better methods to avoid it.
>   Is there a lease lock exist in kernel? 
>   If that's true, the problem will be fixed simply.

I don't know of any existing lock that does exactly what we want.

Somebody at citi worked on a better lease implementation for a while,
but I don't think we ever really got it right; the last version I can
find is here:

	git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git leases

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux