On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:29 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 12-05-10 22:16:03, Subrata Modak wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 17:59 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue 11-05-10 22:05:52, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > It would be great if you can shoot it in the form of a patch, mentioning > > > > > > > > 1. The GPL Lincense, > > > > 2. The purpose of the test case, > > > > 3. Exact location it goes, > > > > 4. Which LTPROOT/runtest/<file> executes it > > > With a help of Cyril I've created the attached patch and verified that > > > the test fails on 2.6.33 but succeeds on 2.6.32... > > > > Great. Thanks for the patch. But, it falters on the latest git. Can you > > please rebase and resend: > Ah, OK. Sorry for that. Now a patch rediffed against latest git tree of > LTP. Hopefully this time I got it right. Thanks. Regards-- Subrata > > Honza -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
