Re: Cleancache [PATCH 2/7] (was Transcendent Memory): core files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:28:09AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> +struct cleancache_ops {
> +	int (*init_fs)(unsigned long);

unsigned long?  Really?  Not even size_t?

> +	int (*init_shared_fs)(char *uuid, unsigned long);

Ditto.

> +	int (*get_page)(int, unsigned long, unsigned long, struct page *);

Ugh.  First of all, presumably you have some structure behind that index,
don't you?  Might be a better way to do it.

What's more, use of ->i_ino is simply wrong.  How stable do you want that
to be and how much do you want it to outlive struct address_space in question?
>From my reading of your code, it doesn't outlive that anyway, so...

The third one is pgoff_t; again, use sane types, _if_ you actually want
the argument #3 at all - it can be derived from struct page you are passing
there as well.

> +	int (*put_page)(int, unsigned long, unsigned long, struct page *);
> +	int (*flush_page)(int, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> +	int (*flush_inode)(int, unsigned long);
> +	void (*flush_fs)(int);

Same questions as above...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux