Re: [PATCH 4/4] Btrfs: add basic DIO read/write support V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:31:45 -0400 Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:14:30AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:40:53PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > V1->V2
> > > -Use __blockdev_direct_IO instead of helper
> > > -Use KM_IRQ0 for kmap instead of KM_USER0
> > 
> > I still don't think this is correct.  The completion can come from
> > softirq and hardirq context, and possibly even normal process context.
> > You either need to check for all these, or you need to use the generic
> > complete in user context helper btrfs has available for other types
> > of I/O.
> > 
> 
> AIO's aio_complete does kmap with KM_IRQ0/1 and it gets called in the same
> context as the btrfs completion handler, so if it's ok for aio_complete it
> should be ok for btrfs right?  Thanks,
> 

Using KM_USERx from irq context is a horrid, horrid bug.

Using KM_IRQx with local interrupts enabled is a ditto.

It's OK to use KM_IRQx from process context as long as local interrupts
are disabled.

kmap slots are just per-cpu variables.  Each one has a particular usage
convention: process-context-only, must-be-irq-safe, etc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux