Re: [PATCH v2] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 10:50:07 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@xxxxxxx>, coly.li@xxxxxxx, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Eelis <opensuse.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amit Arora <aarora@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20100505075556.GA5142@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc11 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3

On 05/05/2010 02:55 AM, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:44:08PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Amit K. Arora wrote:
>>> Here is the new testcase.
>> Thanks!  A few comments...
> Thanks for the review!

Sure thing - looks good, I'll merge it after a retest if it all goes
well.  :)

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
  - From: Nikanth Karthikesan
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
  - From: Coly Li
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
  - From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
  - From: Amit K. Arora
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not
  - From: Amit K. Arora
- Re: [PATCH] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not
  - From: Eric Sandeen
- [PATCH v2] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not
  - From: Amit K. Arora

Prev by Date: [PATCH v4] mtd: Do not corrupt backing device of device node inode
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] quota: unify ->get_dqblk
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]