On Thu, Apr 29 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > The patch: add bdi backing to mount session > (b3d0ab7e60d1865bb6f6a79a77aaba22f2543236) > > Has a bug in the placement of the bdi member at > struct exofs_sb_info. The layout member must be kept > last. > > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/exofs/exofs.h b/fs/exofs/exofs.h > index 5437327..22721b2 100644 > --- a/fs/exofs/exofs.h > +++ b/fs/exofs/exofs.h > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct exofs_sb_info { > u32 s_next_generation; /* next gen # to use */ > atomic_t s_curr_pending; /* number of pending commands */ > uint8_t s_cred[OSD_CAP_LEN]; /* credential for the fscb */ > + struct backing_dev_info bdi; /* register our bdi with VFS */ > > struct pnfs_osd_data_map data_map; /* Default raid to use > * FIXME: Needed ? > @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ struct exofs_sb_info { > struct exofs_layout layout; /* Default files layout, > * contains the variable osd_dev > * array. Keep last */ > - struct backing_dev_info bdi; > struct osd_dev *_min_one_dev[1]; /* Place holder for one dev */ > }; Irk, silly mistake. Apparently I missed the comment, and I did move it prior to _min_one_dev[] but didn't think enough about it. Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html