Changli Gao <xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -50,6 +48,7 @@ struct wait_bit_queue {
> struct __wait_queue_head {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct list_head task_list;
> + struct list_head task_list_ex;
It would be preferable it if you could avoid making struct __wait_queue_head
bigger. That will increase the size of a lot of things.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
