Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > I think there's no question that union mounts might break apps (POSIX
> > or not).  But I think there's hope that they are few and can easily be
> > fixed.
> 
> I couldn't have put it better myself.
> 
> To expand slightly, if the broken apps are not few and easily fixed,
> then we'll go back and make the kernel more complicated.  I'd like to
> try the simplest version we think will work, first.

Don't worry, I'm not trying to deviate you from that good plan.

Just throwing questions out to find what's a good and simple answer to
these little open questions to minimise trouble.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux