On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:30:36 -0400, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 15:10 -0400, Sorin Faibish wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:32:39 -0400, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There are two issues here: stack utilisation and poor IO patterns in
> direct reclaim. They are different.
>
> The poor IO patterns thing is a regression. Some time several years
> ago (around 2.6.16, perhaps), page reclaim started to do a LOT more
> dirty-page writeback than it used to. AFAIK nobody attempted to work
> out why, nor attempted to try to fix it.
I for one am looking very seriously at this problem together with Bruce.
We plan to have a discussion on this topic at the next LSF meeting
in Boston.
As luck would have it, the Memory Management summit is co-located with
the Storage and Filesystem workshop ... how about just planning to lock
all the protagonists in a room if it's not solved by August. The less
extreme might even like to propose topics for the plenary sessions ...
Let's work together to get this done. This is a very good idea. I will try
to bring some facts about the current state by instrumenting the kernel
to sample with higher time granularity the dirty pages dynamics. This will
allow us expose better the problem or lack of. :)
/Sorin
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best Regards
Sorin Faibish
Corporate Distinguished Engineer
Network Storage Group
EMC²
where information lives
Phone: 508-435-1000 x 48545
Cellphone: 617-510-0422
Email : sfaibish@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
