Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:00:58PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >> Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > This is 6'th version of extened inode owner patch-set. >> > Please review it tell me what do you think about all this. >> > Are you agree with this approach? >> > Are you worry about some implementation details? >> > Is it ready for merge to some devel's tree? >> Ping. I haven't got response about the patchset, just small note about >> xattr-name from Andreas. >> Please clarify what do you think about whole idea and >> current patch-set state. What do i have to do to make a progress? > > As long as you still have the awkward ifdefs and different semantics for About ifdefs style: How can i avoid CONFIG_PROJECT_ID without bloating inode size? embedded people will kill me for this. I just act similar quota code, or you want protect prjid logic via quota config option? I don't remember, are we already talk about this? If so please remind me your vision. > "isolation" vs "not" there's still a NACK from me. But in the end Al > will have to decide if he wants to take your patches or not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
