On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:37:10 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Following up on the thread on the checkpoint-restart patch set > > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/1/422), the following series is the > > latest checkpoint/restart, based on 2.6.33. > > > > The first 20 patches are cleanups and prepartion for c/r; they > > are followed by the actual c/r code. > > > > Please apply to -mm, and let us know if there is any way we can > > help. > > Hi Andrew, > > Oren sent v20 of the checkpoint/restart patchset out two weeks ago. > We've addressed some feedback from linux-fsdevel and added network and > pid namespace support. So we could resend again now. However we also > have a bigger patchset in the works which is feature-neutral, but moves > all the code out of linux-2.6/checkpoint/ and next to the code it > affects. I ancitipate #ifdef clashes though, so we'll > need to do quite a bit of various-config-and-arch testing of the new > code layout. If you're at a good point to pull it, we can resend the > code as is now so as to get some wider testing exposure. Or, if you prefer, > we can wait until after the code move in case that would be seen as more > amenable to meaningful review. > I guess the final product would be better. It sounds like it'll have the added benefit of making the various interested parties pay more attention, too ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
