Re: [PATCH -V2] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-03-25, at 18:42, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 22:39 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The below set of patches implement open by handle support using exportfs operations. This allows user space application to map a file name to file
handle and later open the file using handle. This should be usable
for userspace NFS [1] and 9P server [2]. XFS already support this with the ioctls
XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_HANDLE and XFS_IOC_OPEN_BY_HANDLE.

I think this is quite a poor choice of name.  A 'handle' is normally a
capability and a counted reference to some resource. In a Linux context
'file handle' suggests to me a pointer to struct file.  But as I
understand it you are trying to provide an uncounted reference that is
still subject to later permission checks.


In NFS this is currently called a file handle (i.e. an encoded representation of a specific file/inode), so the name is consistent with current usage.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux