On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:26:22AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > @@ -112,12 +112,10 @@ void nfs_unlock_request(struct nfs_page *req)
> > */
> > int nfs_set_page_tag_locked(struct nfs_page *req)
> > {
> > - struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(req->wb_context->path.dentry->d_inode);
> > -
> > if (!nfs_lock_request_dontget(req))
> > return 0;
> > if (req->wb_page != NULL)
> > - radix_tree_tag_set(&nfsi->nfs_page_tree, req->wb_index, NFS_PAGE_TAG_LOCKED);
> > + radix_tree_tag_set(&NFS_I(req->wb_context->path.dentry->d_inode)->nfs_page_tree, req->wb_index, NFS_PAGE_TAG_LOCKED);
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
>
> This hunk is not only entirely unrealted to the fix, but also osbfucates
> the code.
>
> > @@ -126,10 +124,10 @@ int nfs_set_page_tag_locked(struct nfs_page *req)
> > */
> > void nfs_clear_page_tag_locked(struct nfs_page *req)
> > {
> > - struct inode *inode = req->wb_context->path.dentry->d_inode;
> > - struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
> > -
> > if (req->wb_page != NULL) {
> > + struct inode *inode = req->wb_context->path.dentry->d_inode;
> > + struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
> > +
> > spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > radix_tree_tag_clear(&nfsi->nfs_page_tree, req->wb_index, NFS_PAGE_TAG_LOCKED);
> > nfs_unlock_request(req);
>
> Another one unrelated to the fix.
>
No. They are needed because we don't want to dereference req->wb_context
after it (and req->wb_page) have been cleared. Without these 2 hunks,
the resulting kernel Oopses.
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
