Re: [PATCH] vfs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 21:41 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Follow the comment by Eric:
> 
> 	Until the FMODE_ and O_ bits do not overload I think we need to check
> 	FMODE_EXEC and FMODE_NONOTIFY (if you have that one) inside fcntl_init()
> 	as well.  I guess I'll send a patch to someone ?Al? to add FMODE_EXEC to
> 	the list....
> 
> CC: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fcntl.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-mm.orig/fs/fcntl.c	2010-03-12 21:27:12.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-mm/fs/fcntl.c	2010-03-12 21:38:51.000000000 +0800
> @@ -748,7 +748,8 @@ static int __init fcntl_init(void)
>  		O_TRUNC		| O_APPEND	| O_NONBLOCK	|
>  		__O_SYNC	| O_DSYNC	| FASYNC	|
>  		O_DIRECT	| O_LARGEFILE	| O_DIRECTORY	|
> -		O_NOFOLLOW	| O_NOATIME	| O_CLOEXEC
> +		O_NOFOLLOW	| O_NOATIME	| O_CLOEXEC	|
> +		FMODE_EXEC
>  		));

I think we need to update the hweight as well, otherwise I sure hope
this would panic....

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux