Hello, What is correct way to treat i_blocks? i_blocks is a block counter, but its values differ from real number of used blocks (e.g. 1 block is used and written to i_block, but i_blocks is set to 8 and if I set i_blocks to 1 e2fsck always wants to set it to 8). As I understand preallocation shouldn't affect i_blocks and there are no unix holes. Nothing on fs should be updated, when it's mounted in r-only (I mean mount time, mount point attributes of superblock), right? Btw, when I don't have problems with i_blocks, e2fsck's exit status is 1 (my ext2 implementation is guilty), but it doesn't say what was wrong even with "-v". How can I get more verbose results? Thanks in advance for any help. -- Evgeniy Ivanov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
