Re: vfat vs msdos and -o flush

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Commit ae78bf9c4f5fde3c67e2829505f195d7347ce3e4 added a -o flush
>> option to the fat driver back in 2006, which causes asynchronous
>> writeout after I/O operations ASAP.  This already is quite hacky
>> and not something I like very much, but even worse the option
>> is accepted when using the more common vfat filesysten type, but
>> only actually implemented for the less common legacy msdos
>> filesystem type.
>>
>> This tells us two lessons:
>>
>>   - the -o flush option probably never got a whole lot of exposure
>>     and users didn't notice it doesn't work.  We might as well just
>>     remove it again
>
> Sigh. Chris, could you handle this?

It seems there is no answer, so I have no objection to drop it...

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux