On Wed 03-03-10 18:36:58, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed 03-03-10 17:52:00, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > >> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > Get rid of the dquot operations that were used for calls from the > >> > filesystems into the dquot code, clean up the namespace for calls > >> > to the dquot code to always be dquot_, and move the few calls into > >> > the dquot code that were in the VFS into the filesystems. > >> > > >> > This version dddresses various comments from Jan and adds a new patch > >> > to get rid of the QUOTA_OK / NO_QUOTA return values. > >> I'm not able to apply the patch set on top of linux-fs-2.6/for_next > >> and linux-fs-2.6/for_next w/o your previous patches > >> Which tree/commit this patch-set is aimed to? > > It replaces the old version of the series in my for_next branch... > > I'll take care of that. > Ok. > BTW: i've able to apply the patch-set, can you please fold tiny fix > below to appropriate patches. It's aimed to complete error code > handling convention. This allow us later to return other than > EDQUOT errors from quota code. Thanks. Applied. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
