[LSF/VM TOPIC] Re: [Lsf10-pc] Rich-acl discussion for Linus Storage and Filesystem summit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:34:21 +0530, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 10:16 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 20:28 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Suggestion for discussion at LSF summit:
> > > 
> > > Rich-acl patches posted at 
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/17414 helps in
> > > defining a new acl format for Linux that can interoperate better with
> > > NFSv4 acl and CIFS acl. I would like have a discussion on the new acl
> > 
> > What about NTFS?
> > 
> > > format, rules regarding how to handle file mode changes and acl
> > > values. Also how to handle uid to nfs name@domain mapping
> > > 
> > > -aneesh
> > 
> > I very much second this proposal. We've been spinning our wheels on the
> > issue of support for non-posix draft acls for far too long.
> 
> So could we take the proposal to the relevant list to see who else wants
> to talk about it and whether any of the ground work can be covered
> beforehand?
> 

Adding fsdevel, ext4 list. samba will also be interested, but that is
subscriber only list

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux