Re: [PATCH 3/3] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 01:17:08AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:

[full quote deleted, can you please properly trim your replies?]

> So, I guess we can shift IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED and IOMAP_F_STALE by
> 1 bit. So it will all look like.. 

Let's create some more space to avoid this for the next round, e.g.
count the core set flags from 31 down, and limit IOMAP_F_PRIVATE to a
single flag, which is how it is used.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux