Re: [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:39:25 +0000
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250319031545.2999807-6-neil@brown.name>

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:01:36PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:

	efivarfs stuff conflicts with jejb's fixes.  And rpc_pipe
part adds fuckload of conflicts for me; what's more, the only caller to
survive is rpc_d_lookup_sb(); the rest will be gone anyway...

Oh, well...

References:
- [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions
  - From: NeilBrown
- [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS
  - From: NeilBrown

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] VFS: rename lookup_one_len family to lookup_noperm and remove permission check
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in bprm_execve / copy_fs (4)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: Use lookup_one() rather than lookup_one_len()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux