On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:28:36 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > EAGAIN seems like a strange thing to return here. ENOSPC maybe? > > The reason for me using EAGAIN was to give a hint that if the user > reissue the call with new returned handle_size we should be ok. But > Andreas suggested EOVERFLOW. So i will use EOVERFLOW. Do you think > ENOSPC is he right error value here ? EOVERFLOW is probably better than ENOSPC, I'd go with that. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
