On 18/03/2025 13:46, Stephen Eta Zhou wrote: > Hi Krzysztof > >> Just in case before anyone tries to actually apply it: the entire patch >> has both corrupted header and actual patch is corrupted - all >> indentation messed. > > Sorry, this is my oversight..... > I checked it locally using checkpatch.pl and it was fine, but I just used it to import and found that there is a problem. Sorry for wasting your time. I will regenerate this patch and resend it in the correct format. > > Krzysztof, thanks for pointing this out. > > Thanks, > Stephen > ________________________________________ > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 19:55 > To: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>; Stephen Eta Zhou <stephen.eta.zhou@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: jsperbeck@xxxxxxxxxx <jsperbeck@xxxxxxxxxx>; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lukas@xxxxxxxxx <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>; wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] initramfs: Add size validation to prevent tmpfs exhaustion > What is this header doing this? Use standard mailing list response style, not some copy-paste and then quote entire irrelevant context. Best regards, Krzysztof
