On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:32:54 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > try_lookup_one_len() is identical to lookup_one_unlocked() except that > it doesn't include the call to lookup_slow(). The latter doesn't need > the inode to be locked, so the former cannot either. > > So fix the documentation, remove the WARN_ON and fix the only caller to > not take the lock. > > [...] Ok, I merged this into the afs branch with a merge commit explaining why. --- Applied to the vfs-6.15.shared.afs branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. Patches in the vfs-6.15.shared.afs branch should appear in linux-next soon. Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it. It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated. Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase, trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch. tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git branch: vfs-6.15.shared.afs [1/1] VFS/autofs: try_lookup_one_len() does not need any locks https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/be348aed9b44
