在 2025/3/11 16:14, Jinjiang Tu 写道:
在 2025/3/11 2:50, Peter Xu 写道:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:40:35PM +0800, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
在 2025/3/8 6:41, Peter Xu 写道:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 03:11:09PM +0200, jimsiak wrote:
Hi,
From my side, I managed to avoid the freezing of processes with the
following change in function userfaultfd_release() in file
fs/userfaultfd.c
(https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13/source/fs/userfaultfd.c#L842):
I moved the following command from line 851:
WRITE_ONCE(ctx->released, true);
(https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13/source/fs/userfaultfd.c#L851)
to line 905, that is exactly before the functions returns 0.
That simple workaround worked for my use case but I am far from
sure that is
a correct/sufficient fix for the problem at hand.
Updating the field after userfaultfd_ctx_put() might mean UAF, afaict.
Maybe it's possible to remove ctx->released but only rely on the
mmap write
lock. However that'll need some closer look and more thoughts.
To me, the more straightforward way to fix it is to use the patch I
mentioned in the other email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZLmT3BfcmltfFvbq@x1n/
Or does it mean it didn't work at all?
This patch works for me. mlock() syscall calls GUP with
FOLL_UNLOCKABLE and
allows to release mmap lock and retry.
But other GUP call without FOLL_UNLOCKABLE will return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS,
is it a regression for the below commit？
Do you have an explicit reproducer / use case of such?
AFAIU, below commit should only change it from SIGBUS to NOPAGE when
"released" is set. I don't see how it can regress on !FOLL_UNLOCKABLE.
Thanks,
You are right, the below commit seems to only care about page fault
from userspace (which has
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY flag), and doesn't care about GUP from drivers
(which may be !FOLL_UNLOCKABLE)
Thanks.
Hi Peter,
Since this patch works, could you please send a formal patch to maillist?
Thanks.
commit 656710a60e3693911bee3a355d2f2bbae3faba33
Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Sep 8 16:12:42 2017 -0700
userfaultfd: non-cooperative: closing the uffd without
triggering SIGBUS
Thanks,
