On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:54:23AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/03/2025 10:06, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> >> index fbed172d6770..bc96b8214173 100644
> >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> >> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
> >> bool m_fail_unmount;
> >> bool m_finobt_nores; /* no per-AG finobt resv. */
> >> bool m_update_sb; /* sb needs update in mount */
> >> + xfs_extlen_t awu_max; /* data device max atomic write */
> > Could you please rename this to something else? All fields within xfs_mount
> > follows the same pattern m_<name>. Perhaps m_awu_max?
>
> Fine, but I think I then need to deal with spilling multiple lines to
> accommodate a proper comment.
>
> >
> > I was going to send a patch replacing it once I had this merged, but giving
> > Dave's new comments, and the conflicts with zoned devices, you'll need to send a
> > V5, so, please include this change if nobody else has any objections on keeping
> > the xfs_mount naming convention.
>
> What branch do you want me to send this against?
I just pushed everything to for-next, so you can just rebase it against for-next
Notice this includes the iomap patches you sent in this series which Christian
picked up. So if you need to re-work something on the iomap patches, you'll
probably need to take this into account.
Cheers.
Carlos
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
