On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 03:43:19PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > The function is exactly the same as evict_inodes() and has only one > user. <pedantic> nearly the same - evict_inodes() skips the inodes with positive refcount without touching ->i_lock, but they are equivalent (evict_inodes() repeats the refcount check after having grabbed ->i_lock). </pedantic> ACK, except that it might make sense to add a note in D/f/porting.rst - or just add #defined invalidate_inodes evict_inodes for this cycle and remove it (with obvious note in D/f/porting.rst) in the next one.
