On 03/06, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>
> @@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> */
> for (;;) {
> /* Read ->head with a barrier vs post_one_notification() */
> - unsigned int head = smp_load_acquire(&pipe->head);
> - unsigned int tail = pipe->tail;
> - unsigned int mask = pipe->ring_size - 1;
> + unsigned short head = smp_load_acquire(&pipe->head);
> + unsigned short tail = pipe->tail;
> + unsigned short mask = pipe->ring_size - 1;
I dunno... but if we do this, perhaps we should
s/unsigned int/pipe_index_t instead?
At least this would be more grep friendly.
Oleg.
