On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:59:13AM +0100, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I strongly disagree with this approach. This is way worse then making > pid_max per pid namespace. Thanks for taking the look. > I'm fine if you come up with something else that's purely based on > cgroups somehow and is uniform across 64-bit and 32-bit. Allowing to > change the pid allocation strategy just for 32-bit is not the solution > and not mergable. Here's a minimalist correction https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250305145849.55491-1-mkoutny@xxxxxxxx/ Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
